Viravain, Lady of the Thorns shouts, "And You would seize Me? Fool! I am the Glomdoring! I am the Wyrd, and beneath the cloak of Night, the shadows of the Silent stir!"
Make tattoos a trade option for anyone with Kata active?
In your case, you could always skillflex into Tahtetso with their permission and take tattoos. I think that could work.
Everiine said: The reason population is low isn't because there are too many orgs. It's because so many facets of the game are outright broken and protected by those who benefit from it being that way. An overabundance of gimmicks (including game-breaking ones), artifacts that destroy any concept of balance, blatant pay-to-win features, and an obsession with convenience that makes few things actually worthwhile all contribute to the game's sad decline.
In HELP AETHERSHIP it says "Most (but not all) methods of recovering ordinary willpower will work on aetherwill." I know of 3 methods for recovering willpower that don't involve artifacts (campfire, origami, and meditation) and none of them work on aetherwill. Are there methods of recovering aetherwill that don't require artifacts/curios besides just waiting?
Brings to mind things like Psionics Ironwill, and Stag Greenman. Mind you, I have no idea if they actually work or not, but...part of me thinks that line in the file is a big fat lie.
Crumkane, Lord of Epicurean Delights says, "WAS IT INDEED ON FIRE, ERITHEYL."
-
With a deep reverb, Contemptible Sutekh says, "CEASE YOUR INFERNAL ENERGY, ERITHEYL."
In HELP AETHERSHIP it says "Most (but not all) methods of recovering ordinary willpower will work on aetherwill." I know of 3 methods for recovering willpower that don't involve artifacts (campfire, origami, and meditation) and none of them work on aetherwill. Are there methods of recovering aetherwill that don't require artifacts/curios besides just waiting?
It's also worth bearing in mind that a lot of those things (kirigami for instance) used to work on aetherwill, and no longer do. That's probably why the wording of HELP AETHERSHIP seems a bit weird - it predates that change.
It's also worth bearing in mind that a lot of those things (kirigami for instance) used to work on aetherwill, and no longer do. That's probably why the wording of HELP AETHERSHIP seems a bit weird - it predates that change.
I imagined that that was the case. Was just going to suggest that the wording be changed to reflect that.
Being able to search through bugs and display them by status. And also stealing Aetolia's bug system. I posted about it a while back, but would have to find the post.
Please allow us a greater degree of freedom when describing ourselves.
Yourname is a <your race> <whatever you set your description to>.
Viravain, Lady of the Thorns shouts, "And You would seize Me? Fool! I am the Glomdoring! I am the Wyrd, and beneath the cloak of Night, the shadows of the Silent stir!"
#bringShikariback
3
EveriineWise Old Swordsbird / BrontaurIndianapolis, IN, USA
So, remove the "and"?
Everiine is a man, and is very manly. This MAN before you is so manly you might as well just gender bend right now, cause he's the manliest man that you ever did see. His manly shape has spurned many women and girlyer men to boughs of fainting. He stands before you in a manly manerific typical man-like outfit which is covered in his manly motto: "I am a man!"
Daraius said: You gotta risk it for the biscuit.
Pony power all the way, yo. The more Brontaurs the better.
Not sure how possible it is, but a suggestion for the new item targeting syntax: Make negative numbers search from the end. So -1 would get the last one in the list, -2 would get the second-to-last one, etc. Yes, this'd mean that both 0 and -1 would target the same item, but meh.
Viravain, Lady of the Thorns shouts, "And You would seize Me? Fool! I am the Glomdoring! I am the Wyrd, and beneath the cloak of Night, the shadows of the Silent stir!"
Not sure how possible it is, but a suggestion for the new item targeting syntax: Make negative numbers search from the end. So -1 would get the last one in the list, -2 would get the second-to-last one, etc. Yes, this'd mean that both 0 and -1 would target the same item, but meh.
This should be theoretically possible to implement, if a little more clunky.
With the current implementation, it just indexes the list with the number given.
Enjoy some pseudo code!
li = ["item001", "item002", "item003", "item004", "item005"]
So doing get 1.item likely just does li[1].
Your suggestion would require the following:
get -2.item
li[(length(li) + 1) - 2]
Though the syntaxing could easily get more complicated than this, depending on the exact language used. Not impossible, as I said, but clunky!
Yeah, it depends entirely on how items are stored in the room. They're obviously stored in some kind of list (since we get the same order of items at all times), but some lists are only iterable in one direction (i.e. an item has a pointer to the next item in the room, but not the previous) which would mean they'd have to create a temporary array to keep the items in and then start from the bottom of that array. If the list is easily iterable in both directions, it'd be as easy as starting from the bottom and going up instead of starting at the top and going down. I don't think your pseudocode would work, since I kinda doubt they're stored in arrays (then again, I haven't seen the code, so what do I know?)
Being able to search through bugs and display them by status. And also stealing Aetolia's bug system. I posted about it a while back, but would have to find the post.
Yeah our bug tracking system could use an update. The most annoying thing for me too is getting the alert on log-in that one (or more) of your bugs was updated and having no clue which one it was.
Being able to search through bugs and display them by status. And also stealing Aetolia's bug system. I posted about it a while back, but would have to find the post.
Yeah our bug tracking system could use an update. The most annoying thing for me too is getting the alert on log-in that one (or more) of your bugs was updated and having no clue which one it was.
This. So very much this. Having 60+ bugs filed sucks because of this
Our indexed searching (which allows much quicker searching than trying to iterate over every item in the game ever) is only exposed via function calls (so we have no direct access to the underlying data structure to manually grab stuff) and is one-way only. It's would be possible to build up a list of replicas during the search, and that's something I may come back to in the future to allow for something like this, but it's likely not going to be any time soon. In the mean-time, while it's not quite as flexible as indexing from the end of the list, the new IH syntax should make it a lot easier to work with large groups of items.
Comments
Edit: And/or make voting an invested power for clans.
Estarra the Eternal says, "Give Shevat the floor please."
-
As ANALYZE in influence, but on all the denizens in the room.
Signature!
To me, that just makes it even more confusing.
This. So very much this. Having 60+ bugs filed sucks because of this