Right. It's demonstratively false. Does that mean the statement internal to itself is? No. Why do you have to make an argument out of everything? Edit: Remind me to take a course in semantics.
Woah, calm down crusader. To provide context, the statement was regarding the destruction of obejcts, x seconds channel vs. y seconds chopping. I don't think it's an invalid statement.
Also a hexen SD can easily save whammy asthma/paralyse for their under-aeon action. There's beast kick if I am reading the ab correctly, the chance of beast spit mantakaya, webbing will stop shield, all manner of ways, though none of them are i…
Sap is just so easy to stick. It doesn't time out and pretty much anyone can stop it via offeq, paralysis, sprawl of any form, entangle; a lot of the afflictions which delay sap curing are super fast too. The tradeoff is that anyone can cure sap fro…
Eh, I'm pretty sure we were discussing the Tahtetso grapples compared to the other methods they have like double hemi but context doesn't really seem to matter around here anyway. zz
I may or may not use an online sudoku solver and just type the nine numbers into the command bar and let the magic do the rest. I think some form of corner cutting makes it much easier, especially if you've already done it before. (But I faile…