Best Of

rawr! is inherently OOC and doesn't go on IC channels

Baby-talk is not being cutesy, it's being juvenile. Especially on a public aether.

"Problem: The Economy" A thread by Ejderha. March 2018, 6 pages of comments:
https://forums.lusternia.com/discussion/3355/problem-the-economy/p1

"Leaving Lusternia" 2018 march, a thread by Lilyin! 71 votes, 6 pages of comments:
https://forums.lusternia.com/discussion/3349/leaving-lusternia/p1

My personal tipping point for giving up on combat-related events. "Chaos Event Megathread", a thread by Ianir, the lead coding admin of the time. 2018 January:
https://forums.lusternia.com/discussion/3301/chaos-event-megathread/p1

And Glomdoring plays no part in any of it? Sure.

"Shadowtwists and you - A discussion" 2017 October by Kalikai, another balance design admin. But I need to guide you through this one. Hallifax represantative Falaeron comments, Celest represantative Kaimanahi comments, then a Magnagoran Ascendant (And a former Glomdoring player) Karlach comments and then, with no deleted comments or anything, I ensure you, Kalikai is requested to close thread, by Glomdoring represantatives. Because they do not believe a constructive discussion is possible about their skillsets in public:
https://forums.lusternia.com/discussion/comment/180412#Comment_180412

Another attempt to open Shadowtwists up to discussion by a Serenwilde/Celest envoy, I can not remember which org he was in back then, by Minkahmet. Shut down again, as you can see:
https://forums.lusternia.com/discussion/comment/180438#Comment_180438

"Do you feel that glomdoring skillsets in general and whole are superior to other orgs" by Yarith, January 2018. Just an opinion survey, which has a few noncombatant input in the votes in both columns and some unfortunate trolling attempts in the comments. But there it is:
https://forums.lusternia.com/discussion/3305/do-you-feel-that-glomdoring-skillsets-in-general-and-whole-are-superior-to-other-org-counterparts/p1

Hi, I just want to drop in a request that blanket terms such as "your side" or "Glomdoring" used in a general manner to refer to contextual actions/opinions be avoided. As someone belonging to "that side" and not necessarily agreeing with everything that has been said by other players, I don't appreciate either myself or the Glomdoring playerbase as a whole being painted with ugly colours simply by association (unless everyone from "this side" has somehow proven to favour the same stances in every argument and discussion). Thank you!

Everiine said:

Public aethers are not for discussions between two people that don't involve the rest of the org.

how do i like this more than once?

if you don't want eavesdroppers and people chiming in, don't talk in public

Everiine said:

Public aethers are not for discussions between two people that don't involve the rest of the org.

Yes yes a thousand times YES.

Public aethers are not for discussions between two people that don't involve the rest of the org.

Can tell you upfront every org is going to leave Beauty behind, with the only reason to pick it up being the first research power. while the valuation and trading power is a good idea for Beauty to try and make it crafter friendly as a research project, that new system itself isn't going to be reason enough for an entire guild to bypass the superior benefits. Not to mention, pacifying an entire plane, where it does not state that it keeps you from being effected, neuters the entire point of using those powers on an engagement.